Korean phrase
~에 깔린 전제, 정말 타당합니까? ~ e kkal lin cheon je cheong mal ta dang ham ni kka
Meaning
Is the premise underlying ___ really valid?
When to use it
This asks whether an underlying premise is really valid. It politely questions the assumption supporting a policy, plan, or claim.
Example dialogue
재택근무를 확대하면 업무 효율이 반드시 높아진다고 봅니다. chae taek kkeun mu reul hwak ttae ha myeon eom mu hyo yu ri pan deu si no pa jin da go pom ni da
I think expanding remote work will definitely improve work efficiency.
재택근무 확대 정책에 깔린 전제, 정말 타당합니까? chae taek kkeun mu hwak ttae cheong chae ge kkal lin cheon je cheong mal ta dang ham ni kka
Is the premise underlying the policy to expand remote work really valid?